Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33322662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

What are the Critical Elements of Satisfaction and Experience in Labor and Childbirth-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Barbara Baranowska, Anna Kajdy, Paulina Pawlicka, Ernest Pokropek, Michał Rabijewski, Dorota Sys, Artur Pokropek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prevalence and risk factors of maternal dissatisfaction after vaginal delivery: A multicenter prospective study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara BaranowskaDepartment of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna KajdyDepartment of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-8120
Paulina PawlickaDepartment of Cross-Cultural and Gender Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, 80-309 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2342-1583
Ernest PokropekInstitute of Telecommunications, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-9862
Michał RabijewskiDepartment of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.
Dorota SysDepartment of Reproductive Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.
Artur PokropekEducational Research Institute (IBE), 01-180 Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The labor experience and satisfaction with childbirth are affected by the care provided (external factors) and individual variables (internal factors). In this paper, we present a descriptive analysis that aims to indicate the strongest correlates of birth experience among a wide range of indicators. The study is a prospective, cross-sectional, self-report survey. It includes the experiences of women giving birth in public and private hospitals in Poland. The two main variables were birth experience and satisfaction with care. The analysis consists of three parts: data pre-processing and initial analysis, explorative investigation, and regression analysis. Among the 15 variables with the highest predictive value regarding birth experience were being informed by the medical personnel, communication, and birth environment. The most significant variables among 15 variables, with the highest predictive value regarding care, were those concerning support, information, and respectful care. The strongest predictor for both, birth experience and satisfaction with care, is the sense of information, with logit coefficients of 0.745 and 1.143, respectively, for birth experience and satisfaction (0.367 and 0.346 for standardized OLS coefficient). The findings demonstrate that by using explanatory variables, one can predict a woman's description of her satisfaction with perinatal care received in the hospital. On the other hand, they do not have such a significant and robust influence on the birth experience examined by the variables. For both the birth experience and satisfaction with care, the sense of being informed is the highest predictor.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricPersonal SatisfactionChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPatient SatisfactionPolandPregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairescross-sectional studiesexperiencelaborperinatal carePoland

Identifiers

PMID33322662
PMCPMC7764244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.