Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33322629›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

The "Fortilat" Randomized Clinical Trial Follow-Up: Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 18 Months of Age.

Chiara Peila, Elena Spada, Sonia Deantoni, Ester Iuliano, Guido E Moro, Marzia Giribaldi, Laura Cavallarin, Francesco Cresi, Alessandra Coscia

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara PeilaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0075-5353
Elena SpadaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Sonia DeantoniDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Ester IulianoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Guido E MoroItalian Association of Human Milk Banks, Via Libero Temolo 4, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-3257
Marzia GiribaldiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-7684
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-1683
Francesco CresiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2139-6855
Alessandra CosciaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatric, Neonatal Unit of Turin University, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITCereal Research Centre · ITInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate nutrition is fundamental to neonatal survival and short-term outcomes, but it also has long-term consequences on quality of life and neurologic development of preterm infants. Donkey milk has been suggested as a valid alternative for children allergic to cows' milk proteins, due to its biochemical similarity to human milk; we, hence, hypothesized that donkey milk could be a suitable basis for developing an innovative human milk fortifier for feeding preterm infants. The aim of the current study was to extend the findings and to evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of corrected age of the infants enrolled in the clinical trial named "Fortilat". Infants born ≤1500 g and <32 weeks of gestational age were randomized to receive either a combination of bovine milk-based multicomponent fortifier and protein supplement or a combination of a novel multicomponent fortifier and protein supplement derived from donkey milk. The followed fortification protocol was the same for the two groups and the two diets were designed to be isoproteic and isocaloric. All infants enrolled were included in a developmental assessment program. The neurodevelopmental assessment was performed at 18 ± 6 months of corrected age. Minor and major neurodevelopmental impairment and General Quotient (GQ) at the Griffiths-II Mental Development Scale were considered. The GQ was considered both in continuous and as two classes: lower than and higher than (or equal to) a defined cutoff (GQcl). The difference in GQ and GQcl between the two arms was estimated using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test or Fischer exact test, respectively, on the assumption of casual loss at follow-up. A further analysis was performed using generalized linear models. There were 103 children (bovine milk-derived fortifier arm = 54, donkey milk-derived fortifier arm = 49) included for the neurodevelopmental follow-up. All observations were included in the interval of 18 ± 6 months of corrected age. No significant difference was observed between the two arms in the incidence of neurologic sequelae and the GQs were similar in the two arms. Our results demonstrated no difference for the donkey milk-derived fortifier compared to standard bovine-derived fortifier regarding long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedMilkAnimalsCattleEquidaeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Very Low Birth WeightLinear ModelsMaleMental Status and Dementia Testsadjustable fortificationdonkey milkGQhuman milkhuman milk fortifierneurodevelopment outcomepreterm infantsVLBW infants

Identifiers

PMID33322629
PMCPMC7764145
OpenAlexW3111821731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.