Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33322594›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Gesture Elicitation Study of Nose-Based Gestures.

Jorge-Luis Pérez-Medina, Santiago Villarreal, Jean Vanderdonckt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge-Luis Pérez-MedinaIntelligent and Interactive Systems Lab (SI2 Lab), Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170504, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-4864-0480
Santiago VillarrealLouRIM Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-1637
Jean VanderdoncktLouRIM Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-3333
UCLouvain · BEUniversidad de Las Américas · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presently, miniaturized sensors can be embedded in any small-size wearable to recognize movements on some parts of the human body. For example, an electrooculography-based sensor in smart glasses recognizes finger movements on the nose. To explore the interaction capabilities, this paper conducts a gesture elicitation study as a between-subjects experiment involving one group of 12 females and one group of 12 males, expressing their preferred nose-based gestures on 19 Internet-of-Things tasks. Based on classification criteria, the 912 elicited gestures are clustered into 53 unique gestures resulting in 23 categories, to form a taxonomy and a consensus set of 38 final gestures, providing researchers and practitioners with a larger base with six design guidelines. To test whether the measurement method impacts these results, the agreement scores and rates, computed for determining the most agreed gestures upon participants, are compared with the Condorcet and the de Borda count methods to observe that the results remain consistent, sometimes with a slightly different order. To test whether the results are sensitive to gender, inferential statistics suggest that no significant difference exists between males and females for agreement scores and rates.

Indexed as

FingersGesturesNoseAdultFemaleHumansInternet of ThingsMaleMovementagreement rate and scoregestural interactiongesture elicitation studywearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID33322594
PMCPMC7763853
OpenAlexW3111842805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.