ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Healthy Places for Children: The Critical Role of Engagement, Common Vision, and Collaboration.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local Responses to Limits on U.S. Public Health Authority During the COVID-19 Emergency.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- "Sacred ground for kids": Institutional perspectives on rural school-based health centers as patient-centered medical homes.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Age-Friendly Cities in Latin America: A Human Ecological Framework.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Linking Urban Planning, Community Environment, and Physical Activity: A Socio-Ecological Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Can the Timed and Targeted Counseling Model Improve the Quality of Maternal and Newborn Health Care? A Process Analysis in the Rural Hoima District in Uganda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- More Than Shelter: Housing for Urban Maternal and Infant Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Neighborhood-Level Lead Paint Hazard for Children under 6: A Tool for Proactive and Equitable Intervention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Housing and Community Environments vs. Independent Mobility: Roles in Promoting Children's Independent Travel and Unsupervised Outdoor Play.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- COVID-19 Policy Differences across US States: Shutdowns, Reopening, and Mask Mandates.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Planning plays a critical role in promoting healthy communities for children. We conducted a national survey of United States (US) cities and counties in 2019 and found only half of the 1312 responding communities report they give attention to the needs of children in their community plans. Those that do, provide more services and have more child-friendly zoning codes. We use a human ecological framework to build structural equation models of child-friendly zoning and services. We find communities with more engagement of families with children and youth and a common vision across generational, race, and ethnic lines report higher levels of child-friendly zoning and services. Collaboration between health providers and schools builds trust and leads to more services. However, child-friendly zoning is lower in communities with higher child poverty, and in suburbs and rural areas. Our results support a dynamic human ecological model where the processes of collaboration, inclusion, and engagement are key to creating healthy places for children. These processes may be especially important in addressing the unique challenges of suburban and rural communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.