ReviewPolymers2020
Current Advances in 3D Bioprinting Technology and Its Applications for Tissue Engineering.
Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital light processing bioprinting: bioink innovations and applications in tissue and organ regeneration.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Physical and Mechanical Characterisation of 3D-Bioprinted Hydrogels for Dental Applications: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovative prospects in 3D printed bio-scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: A systematic review.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Acoustic Bioprinting: A Glimpse Into an Emerging Field.Small methods · 2026Review
- Regenerative Dentistry: Applications of Bioactive Materials in Dentin-Pulp Complex.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Hydrogel Microspheres for Biomedical Applications.Small science · 2026Review
- Progressive Insights into 3D Bioprinting for Corneal Tissue Restoration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Bioengineering Stem Cell-Derived Glioblastoma Organoids: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Bioprinting revolution: Innovative design of 3D bioactive scaffolds for living organs and transdermal tissues.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Bioprinted Scaffolds for Biomimetic Applications: A State-of-the-Art Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Construction of organoids using bioprinting technology: a frontier exploration of cartilage repair.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Optimizing Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Donor Sites: A Comparative Study of Ulnar-Based Flap and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Advances in Drug Delivery Integrated with Regenerative Medicine: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Frontiers.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Cancer Modeling and Biomedicine: From Print Categories to Biological Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Functional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Methods, and Future Directions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in Implantable 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Repair of Spinal Cord Injury.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2024Review
- The Synergetic Effect of 3D Printing and Electrospinning Techniques in the Fabrication of Bone Scaffolds.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Advanced 3D imaging and organoid bioprinting for biomedical research and therapeutic applications.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has emerged as a powerful biofabrication platform for tissue engineering because of its ability to engineer living cells and biomaterial-based 3D objects. Over the last few decades, droplet-based, extrusion-based, and laser-assisted bioprinters have been developed to fulfill certain requirements in terms of resolution, cell viability, cell density, etc. Simultaneously, various bio-inks based on natural-synthetic biomaterials have been developed and applied for successful tissue regeneration. To engineer more realistic artificial tissues/organs, mixtures of bio-inks with various recipes have also been developed. Taken together, this review describes the fundamental characteristics of the existing bioprinters and bio-inks that have been currently developed, followed by their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, various tissue engineering applications using 3D bioprinting are briefly introduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.