Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33322197›Full record

ArticleJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Fungal Dysbiosis Correlates with the Development of Tumor-Induced Cachexia in Mice.

Daniela L Jabes, Yara N L F de Maria, David Aciole Barbosa, Kaltinaitis B N H Santos, Lucas M Carvalho, Ana Carolina Humberto, Valquíria C Alencar, Regina Costa de Oliveira, Miguel L Batista, Fabiano B Menegidio and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Involvement of the gut microbiota in cancer cachexia.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Immunoregulation in cancer-associated cachexia.Journal of advanced research · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Targeting Gut Microbiota in Cancer Cachexia: Towards New Treatment Options.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela L JabesNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7297-0784
Yara N L F de MariaNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
David Aciole BarbosaNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3875-2307
Kaltinaitis B N H SantosNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Lucas M CarvalhoNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Ana Carolina HumbertoNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Valquíria C AlencarNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Regina Costa de OliveiraNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Miguel L BatistaNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-5131
Fabiano B MenegidioNúcleo Integrado de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes (UMC), São Paulo 08780-911, Brazil.
Luiz R NunesCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), São Bernardo do Campo 09606-045, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-269X
Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/08112-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/13197-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cachexia (CC) is a devastating metabolic syndrome associated with a series of underlying diseases that greatly affects life quality and expectancy among cancer patients. Studies involving mouse models, in which CC was induced through inoculation with tumor cells, originally suggested the existence of a direct correlation between the development of this syndrome and changes in the relative proportions of several bacterial groups present in the digestive tract. However, these analyses have focus solely on the characterization of bacterial dysbiosis, ignoring the possible existence of changes in the relative populations of fungi, during the development of CC. Thus, the present study sought to expand such analyses, by characterizing changes that occur in the gut fungal population (mycobiota) of mice, during the development of cancer-induced cachexia. Our results confirm that cachectic animals, submitted to Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) transplantation, display significant differences in their gut mycobiota, when compared to healthy controls. Moreover, identification of dysbiotic fungi showed remarkable consistency across successive levels of taxonomic hierarchy. Many of these fungi have also been associated with dysbioses observed in a series of gut inflammatory diseases, such as obesity, colorectal cancer (CRC), myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nonetheless, the dysbiosis verified in the LLC model of cancer cachexia seems to be unique, presenting features observed in both obesity (reduced proportion of Mucoromycota) and CRC/ME/IBD (increased proportions of Sordariomycetes, Saccharomycetaceae and

Indexed as

cachexiamicrobiomemicrobiotamycobiotanext generation sequencingNGS

Identifiers

PMID33322197
PMCPMC7770573
OpenAlexW3113121403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.