Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321999›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Rare Pathogenic Copy Number Variation in the 16p11.2 (BP4-BP5) Region Associated with Neurodevelopmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Review of the Literature.

Natália Oliva-Teles, Maria Chiara de Stefano, Louise Gallagher, Severin Rakic, Paula Jorge, Goran Cuturilo, Silvana Markovska-Simoska, Isabella Borg, Jeanne Wolstencroft, Zeynep Tümer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Natália Oliva-TelesCentro de Genética Médica Doutor Jacinto Magalhães/Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1295-3701
Maria Chiara de StefanoItalian National Transplant Center, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Louise GallagherTrinity Institute of Neurosciences, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin 152-160, Ireland.
Severin RakicPublic Health Institute of Republic of Srpska, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-3614
Paula JorgeCentro de Genética Médica Doutor Jacinto Magalhães/Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-222X
Goran CuturiloFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Silvana Markovska-SimoskaMacedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Skopje 1000, North Macedonia.ORCID 0000-0002-9403-7343
Isabella BorgDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta.
Jeanne WolstencroftUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-9731
Zeynep TümerKennedy Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhangen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4777-5802
Adrian J HarwoodNeuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute (NMHRI), & School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK.
Yllka KodraNational Centre for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6904-7451
David SkuseUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-5732
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity College London · GBCardiff University · GBIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITMacedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts · MKPublic Health Institute of the Republic of Srpska · BATrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Malta · MT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011166/1Medical Research Council MR/N022572/1Medical Research Council MR/T033045/1MRF_ MRF-154-0001-RG-SKUSE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variants (CNVs) play an important role in the genetic underpinnings of neuropsychiatric/neurodevelopmental disorders. The chromosomal region 16p11.2 (BP4-BP5) harbours both deletions and duplications that are associated in carriers with neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric conditions as well as several rare disorders including congenital malformation syndromes. The aim of this article is to provide a review of the current knowledge of the diverse neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) associated with 16p11.2 deletions and duplications reported in published cohorts. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE electronic database limited to papers published in English between 1 January 2010 and 31 July 2020, describing 16p11.2 deletions and duplications carriers' cohorts. Twelve articles meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed from the 75 articles identified by the search. Of these twelve papers, eight described both deletions and duplications, three described deletions only and one described duplications only. This study highlights the heterogeneity of NDD descriptions of the selected cohorts and inconsistencies concerning accuracy of data reporting.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsChromosome DeletionChromosome DisordersChromosome DuplicationChromosomes, Human, Pair 16HeterozygoteHumansMental DisordersNeurodevelopmental Disorders16p11.2 deletion16p11.2 duplicationBP4–BP5copy numbers variantsneurodevelopmental disordersrare diseases

Identifiers

PMID33321999
PMCPMC7763014
OpenAlexW3110956803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.