ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Structure State Prediction in Operational Load Monitoring.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiscale Analysis of Composite Structures with Artificial Neural Network Support for Micromodel Stress Determination.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction performance analysis of neural network models for an electrical discharge turning process.International journal on interactive design and manufacturing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of operational load monitoring is to make predictions about the remaining usability time of structures, which is extremely useful in aerospace industry where in-service life of aircraft structural components can be maximized, taking into account safety. In order to make such predictions, strain sensors are mounted to the structure, from which data are acquired during operational time. This allows to determine how many load cycles has the structure withstood so far. Continuous monitoring of the strain distribution of the whole structure can be complicated due to vicissitude nature of the loads. Sensors should be mounted in places where stress and strain accumulations occur, and due to experiencing variable loads, the number of required sensors may be high. In this work, different machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are implemented to predict the current safety factor of the structure in its most stressed point, based on relatively low number of strain measurements. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), support-vector machines (SVM) and Gaussian processes for machine learning (GPML) are trained with simulation data, and their effectiveness is measured using data obtained from experiments. The proposed methods are compared to the earlier work where artificial neural networks (ANN) were proven to be efficiently used for reduction of the number of sensors in operational load monitoring processes. A numerical comparison of accuracy and computational time (taking into account possible real-time applications) between all considered methods is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.