Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321959›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Optimising an FFQ Using a Machine Learning Pipeline to teach an Efficient Nutrient Intake Predictive Model.

Nina Reščič, Tome Eftimov, Barbara Koroušić Seljak, Mitja Luštrek

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina ReščičDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tome EftimovComputer Systems Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7330-1902
Barbara Koroušić SeljakComputer Systems Department, Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7597-2590
Mitja LuštrekDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-2935

Funding

Horizon 2020 769765Horizon 2020 863059Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P2-0098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are the most commonly selected tools in nutrition monitoring, as they are inexpensive, easily implemented and provide useful information regarding dietary intake. They are usually carefully drafted by experts from nutritional and/or medical fields and can be validated by using other dietary monitoring techniques. FFQs can get very extensive, which could indicate that some of the questions are less significant than others and could be omitted without losing too much information. In this paper, machine learning is used to explore how reducing the number of questions affects the predicted nutrient values and diet quality score. The paper addresses the problem of removing redundant questions and finding the best subset of questions in the Extended Short Form Food Frequency Questionnaire (ESFFFQ), developed as part of the H2020 project WellCo. Eight common machine-learning algorithms were compared on different subsets of questions by using the PROMETHEE method, which compares methods and subsets via multiple performance measures. According to the results, for some of the targets, specifically sugar intake, fiber intake and protein intake, a smaller subset of questions are sufficient to predict diet quality scores. Additionally, for smaller subsets of questions, machine-learning algorithms generally perform better than statistical methods for predicting intake and diet quality scores. The proposed method could therefore be useful for finding the most informative subsets of questions in other FFQs as well. This could help experts develop FFQs that provide the necessary information and are not overbearing for those answering.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultClinical Decision RulesDietDiet, HealthyDiet SurveysFemaleHumansMaleNutrition AssessmentPredictive Value of TestsRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdimensionality reductionfeature selectionfood frequency questionnairemachine learningmissing dataPROMETHEEsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33321959
PMCPMC7764455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.