Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321918›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2020

Cognitive Benefits of Activity Engagement among 12,093 Adults Aged over 65 Years.

Jieting Zhang, Liye Zou, Can Jiao, Minqiang Zhang, Lina Wang, Wook Song, Qian Yu, Igor Grabovac, Yanjie Zhang, Peter Willeit and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Jieting ZhangInstitute of Mental Health, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Liye ZouInstitute of Mental Health, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6411-5710
Can JiaoInstitute of Mental Health, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Minqiang ZhangCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Lina WangInstitute of Mental Health, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Wook SongHealth & Exercise Science Laboratory, Institute of Sports Science, Department of Kinesiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8825-6259
Qian YuExercise and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8882-1994
Igor GrabovacDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-1467
Yanjie ZhangHealth & Exercise Science Laboratory, Institute of Sports Science, Department of Kinesiology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7964-2326
Peter WilleitDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Lin YangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-6666
Shenzhen University · CNSeoul National University · KRAlberta Health Services · CAInnsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATSouth China Normal University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700982); Educational Science Foundation in Shenzhen (zdzz16004); Guangdong planning project of Philosophy and Social Sciences (GD17YXL01); Guangzhou Education Scientific Planning Subject (1201411413); Guangz National Natural Science Foundation of China (31700982); Educational Science Foundation in Shenzhen (zdzz16004); Guangdong planning project of Philosophy and Social Sciences (GD17YXL01); Guangzhou Education Scientific Planning Subject (1201411413); Guangz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study includes two aims: (1) to understand patterns of activity engagement among older Chinese adults; (2) to further investigate associations between activity engagement and cognitive abilities in this population.

methodsLatent class analysis was applied to answer the aforementioned research questions across different age ranges while controlling for confounding variables (age, health, socioeconomic status (SES), and living alone). Specifically, five latent classes (non-active, working-active, comprehensive-active, physical-active, and less-active) were identified. Furthermore, associations between the classes of activity engagement and cognition were examined separately in three age groups: less than 80 years (young-old group), 80-99.5 years (old-old group) and more than 100 years (oldest-old group) of age.

resultsCompared with Non-active older individuals, the other classes with a higher probability of engagement in various activities generally showed higher cognitive abilities (including general cognition, orientation, calculation, recall, and language), but not all patterns of active engagement in daily life were positively associated with better cognitive status across different age ranges. In particular, differences in the individuals' cognitive abilities across the four active latent classes were especially obvious in the old-old group as follows: the Comprehensive-active class had higher general cognitive and recall abilities than the other three active classes and higher calculation and language abilities than the Working-active class. In addition, significant sex differences were observed in activity patterns, cognition, and their associations in the young-old and old-old groups. Culture-specific programs should be customized to subgroups of different ages and genders by providing different training or activity modules based on their related dimensions of cognitive decline.

Indexed as

activityagingcognitionlifestyleolder adults

Identifiers

PMID33321918
PMCPMC7764821
OpenAlexW3111855860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.