Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321854›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Alejandro Moreno-Gavíra, Victoria Huertas, Fernando Diánez, Brenda Sánchez-Montesinos, Mila Santos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nematicidal Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Registration Situation and Use of Mycopesticides in the World.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Biocontrol of Diseases Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Comparative Effectiveness of Filamentous Fungi in Biocontrol ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandro Moreno-GavíraDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Victoria HuertasDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Fernando DiánezDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1890-6594
Brenda Sánchez-MontesinosDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Mila SantosDepartamento de Agronomía, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-3279
University of Almería · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating beneficial microorganisms in crop production is the most promising strategy for maintaining agricultural productivity and reducing the use of inorganic fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Numerous microorganisms have been described in the literature as biological control agents for pests and diseases, although some have not yet been commercialised due to their lack of viability or efficacy in different crops.

Indexed as

biological controldiseasesPaecilomycespests

Identifiers

PMID33321854
PMCPMC7763231
OpenAlexW3112342507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.