Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321824›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Breath Analysis: Comparison among Methodological Approaches for Breath Sampling.

Alessia Di Gilio, Jolanda Palmisani, Gianrocco Ventrella, Laura Facchini, Annamaria Catino, Niccolò Varesano, Pamela Pizzutilo, Domenico Galetta, Massimo Borelli, Pierluigi Barbieri and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Systematic comparison of methods for offline breath sampling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. High-quality identification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) originating from breath.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessia Di GilioDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-4498
Jolanda PalmisaniDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-5743
Gianrocco VentrellaDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Laura FacchiniDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.
Annamaria CatinoThoracic Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Niccolò VaresanoThoracic Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Pamela PizzutiloThoracic Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.
Domenico GalettaThoracic Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-5906
Massimo BorelliDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Pierluigi BarbieriDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Sabina LicenDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-396X
Gianluigi de GennaroDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6868-6569
Istituto Tumori Bari · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite promising results obtained in the early diagnosis of several pathologies, breath analysis still remains an unused technique in clinical practice due to the lack of breath sampling standardized procedures able to guarantee a good repeatability and comparability of results. The most diffuse on an international scale breath sampling method uses polymeric bags, but, recently, devices named Mistral and ReCIVA, able to directly concentrate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) onto sorbent tubes, have been developed and launched on the market. In order to explore performances of these new automatic devices with respect to sampling in the polymeric bag and to study the differences in VOCs profile when whole or alveolar breath is collected and when pulmonary wash out with clean air is done, a tailored experimental design was developed. Three different breath sampling approaches were compared: (a) whole breath sampling by means of Tedlar bags, (b) the end-tidal breath collection using the Mistral sampler, and (c) the simultaneous collection of the whole and alveolar breath by using the ReCIVA. The obtained results showed that alveolar fraction of breath was relatively less affected by ambient air (AA) contaminants (

Indexed as

AdultBreath TestsData AnalysisFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSpecimen HandlingVolatile Organic CompoundsYoung AdultVolatile Organic Compoundsbreath analysisbreath samplingbreath sampling devicesend-tidal breathMistralReCIVAstandardization

Identifiers

PMID33321824
PMCPMC7763204
OpenAlexW3110663202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.