Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321781›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2020

Biostimulants for Plant Growth and Mitigation of Abiotic Stresses: A Metabolomics Perspective.

Lerato Nephali, Lizelle A Piater, Ian A Dubery, Veronica Patterson, Johan Huyser, Karl Burgess, Fidele Tugizimana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Exogenous Melatonin Confers Salt-Alkali Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Special Issue: "Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Biostimulants".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. AFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lerato NephaliResearch Centre for Plant Metabolomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.
Lizelle A PiaterResearch Centre for Plant Metabolomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-0109
Ian A DuberyResearch Centre for Plant Metabolomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-4769
Veronica PattersonInternational Research and Development, Omnia Group, Johannesburg 2191, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2037-4929
Johan HuyserInternational Research and Development, Omnia Group, Johannesburg 2191, South Africa.
Karl BurgessInstitute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.
Fidele TugizimanaResearch Centre for Plant Metabolomics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-6599

Funding

Innovate UK Innovate UK/DFID Agri-Tech Catalyst-105662Omnia Group, Ltd, South Africa n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adverse environmental conditions due to climate change, combined with declining soil fertility, threaten food security. Modern agriculture is facing a pressing situation where novel strategies must be developed for sustainable food production and security. Biostimulants, conceptually defined as non-nutrient substances or microorganisms with the ability to promote plant growth and health, represent the potential to provide sustainable and economically favorable solutions that could introduce novel approaches to improve agricultural practices and crop productivity. Current knowledge and phenotypic observations suggest that biostimulants potentially function in regulating and modifying physiological processes in plants to promote growth, alleviate stresses, and improve quality and yield. However, to successfully develop novel biostimulant-based formulations and programs, understanding biostimulant-plant interactions, at molecular, cellular and physiological levels, is a prerequisite. Metabolomics, a multidisciplinary omics science, offers unique opportunities to predictively decode the mode of action of biostimulants on crop plants, and identify signatory markers of biostimulant action. Thus, this review intends to highlight the current scientific efforts and knowledge gaps in biostimulant research and industry, in context of plant growth promotion and stress responses. The review firstly revisits models that have been elucidated to describe the molecular machinery employed by plants in coping with environmental stresses. Furthermore, current definitions, claims and applications of plant biostimulants are pointed out, also indicating the lack of biological basis to accurately postulate the mechanisms of action of plant biostimulants. The review articulates briefly key aspects in the metabolomics workflow and the (potential) applications of this multidisciplinary omics science in the biostimulant industry.

Indexed as

abiotic stressesbiostimulantsfood securitygrowth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)metabolomicsplant defenses

Identifiers

PMID33321781
PMCPMC7764227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.