Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321287›Full record

ArticleOral oncology2021

Hypofractionated chemoradiation for head and cancer: Data from the PET NECK trial.

M Vreugdenhil, Charles Fong, Paul Sanghera, Andrew Hartley, Janet Dunn, Hisham Mehanna

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Hypofractionated split-course radiotherapy in frail older patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiotherapy during the COVID-19: a review about management and treatment strategies.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M VreugdenhilInstitute of Head & Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, UK; Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Charles FongInstitute of Head & Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, UK; Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Paul SangheraInstitute of Head & Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, UK; Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Andrew HartleyInstitute of Head & Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, UK; Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: andrew.hartley@uhb.nhs.uk.
Janet DunnWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Hisham MehannaInstitute of Head & Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, UK.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been increased interest in hypofractionated accelerated chemoradiation for head and neck cancer during the recent first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospective data regarding this approach from randomised trials is lacking. In the PET NECK study, 564 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving definitive chemoradiation were randomised to either planned neck dissection or PET CT scan guided surveillance. In this surgical trial, three radiotherapy fractionation schedules delivered over 7, 6 or 4 weeks were permitted with synchronous chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine efficacy and quality of life outcomes associated with the use of these schedules. Primary local control and overall survival in addition to quality of life measures at immediately post treatment and 6, 12 and 24 months post-treatment were compared between the three fractionation cohorts. In the 525 patients where fractionation data was available, 181 (34%), 288 (55%) and 56 (11%) patients received 68-70 Gy in 34-35 fractions (#), 60-66 Gy in 30# and 55 Gy in 20# respectively. At a minimum follow up of two years following treatment there was no significant difference between the three fractionation schemes in local control, overall survival or any quality of life measure. Despite the obvious limitations of this study, some data is provided to support the use of hypofractionated accelerated chemoradiation to avoid delays in cancer treatment and reduce hospital visits during the peak of a pandemic. Data from on-going randomised trials examining hypofractionated chemoradiation may be useful for selecting fractionation schedules during future pandemics.

Indexed as

PandemicsRadiation Dose HypofractionationSARS-CoV-2AgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCOVID-19FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyQuality of LifeCOVID 19FractionationHead and neck cancerHypofractionated chemoradiationPandemic

Identifiers

PMID33321287
PMCPMC7733600
OpenAlexW3110935156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.