Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321286›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2021

Essential work, precarious labour: The need for safer and equitable harm reduction work in the era of COVID-19.

Michelle Olding, Allison Barker, Ryan McNeil, Jade Boyd

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Health and Safety Experiences of Precariously Employed Bangladeshi Immigrant Workers in Toronto During the COVID-19 Pandemic.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ingenuity and resiliency of syringe service programs on the front lines of the opioid overdose and COVID-19 crises.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle OldingBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Allison BarkerBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6.
Ryan McNeilBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Jade BoydBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: jade.boyd@bccsu.ubc.ca.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAYale University · US

Funding

An ethno-epidemiological study of the implementation and effectiveness of an innovative and comprehensive response to the opioid epidemicR01DA044181 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary highlights labour concerns and inequities within the harm reduction sector that hinder programs' ability to respond to converging public health emergencies (the overdose crisis and COVID-19), and potentially contribute to spread of the novel coronavirus. Many harm reduction programs continue to support people who use illicit drugs (PWUD) during the pandemic, yet PWUD working in harm reduction programs (sometimes termed 'peers') experience precarious labour conditions characterized by low wages, minimal employee benefits (such as paid sick leave) and high employment insecurity. Along with precarious labour conditions, PWUD face heightened vulnerabilities to COVID-19 and yet have been largely overlooked in global response to the pandemic. Operating under conditions of economic and legal precarity, harm reduction programs' reliance on precarious labour (e.g. on-call, temporary and unpaid work) renders some services vulnerable to staffing shortages and service disruptions during the pandemic, while also heightening the risk of virus transmission among workers, service users and their communities. We call for immediate policy and programmatic actions to strengthen working conditions within these settings with a priority on enhancing protections and supports for workers in peer roles.

Indexed as

Drug UsersEmploymentHarm ReductionHealthcare DisparitiesOccupational HealthCOVID-19HumansOccupational ExposurePeer GroupRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersCOVID-19Harm reductionOccupational safetyOpioid overdosePrecarious employment

Identifiers

PMID33321286
PMCPMC8117049
OpenAlexW3111209782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.