Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33321004›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Current Status of Advance Care Planning and End-of-life Communication for Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Yasuaki Sagara, Masanori Mori, Sena Yamamoto, Keiko Eguchi, Tsuguo Iwatani, Yoichi Naito, Takahiro Kogawa, Kiyo Tanaka, Haruru Kotani, Hiroyuki Yasojima and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Early and late code status documentation in cancer patients managed by a dedicated supportive care team.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Re-imagining metastatic breast cancer care delivery: a patient-partnered qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yasuaki SagaraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5705-1739
Masanori MoriDepartment of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Sena YamamotoDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Keiko EguchiDepartment of Nursing, Social Medical Corporation Hakuaikai, Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Tsuguo IwataniDepartment of Breast Surgery, Experimental Therapeutics, and Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yoichi NaitoDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Experimental Therapeutics, and Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takahiro KogawaDivision of Early Clinical Development for Cancer, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyo TanakaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruru KotaniDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroyuki YasojimaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Oncology, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yukinori OzakiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Emi NoguchiDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Minoru MiyasitaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgical Oncology, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Naoto KondoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masakazu ToiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tadahiko ShienDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is a process that supports adults in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. We examined the current status of ACP and end-of-life (EOL) communication between oncologists and patients with metastatic breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a survey among 41 institutions that specialize in oncology by using an online tool in October 2019. Participants (118 physicians) from 38 institutions completed a 39-item questionnaire that measured facility type and function; physicians' background and clinical approach, education about EOL communication, and understanding about ACP; and the current situation of ACP and EOL discussions.

resultsNinety-eight responses concerning physicians' engagement in ACP with patients were obtained. Seventy-one (72%) answered that they had engaged in ACP. Among these, 23 (33%) physicians used a structured format to facilitate the conversation in their institutions, and only 6 (8%) settled triggers or sentinel events for the initiation of ACP. In the multivariable analysis, only the opportunity to learn communication skills was associated with physicians' engagement with ACP (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-7.0). The frequency and timing of communication about ACP and EOL care with patients substantially varied among the oncologists. Communication about patients' life expectancy was less frequent compared with other topics.

conclusionThe opportunity to improve EOL communication skills promoted physicians' engagement with ACP among patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer. However, there were still substantial variabilities in the method, frequency, and timing of ACP and EOL communication among the oncologists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study found that the opportunity to improve end-of-life (EOL) communication skills promoted physicians' engagement in advance care planning (ACP) among patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer. All oncologists who treat said patients are encouraged to participate in effective education programs concerning EOL communication skills. In clinical practice, there are substantial variabilities in the method, frequency, and timing of ACP and EOL communication among oncologists. As recommended in several clinical guidelines, the authors suggest a system that identifies patients who require conversations about their care goals, a structured format to facilitate the conversations, and continuous measurement for improving EOL care and treatment.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningBreast NeoplasmsTerminal CareAdultCommunicationDeathFemaleHumansAdvance care planningCommunicationEnd-of-life discussionMetastatic breast cancerPatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID33321004
PMCPMC8018302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.