Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320961›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Age-stratified reference intervals unlock the clinical potential of circulating cell-free DNA as a biomarker of poor outcome for healthy individuals and patients with colorectal cancer.

Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft, Sarah Østrup Jensen, Nadia Øgaard, Tenna Vesterman Henriksen, Linnea Ferm, Ib Jarle Christensen, Thomas Reinert, Ole Halfdan Larsen, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cell-free DNA Concentration as a Biomarker of Response and Recurrence in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mai-Britt Worm ØrntoftDepartment of Surgery, Herning Regional Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Sarah Østrup JensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nadia ØgaardDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tenna Vesterman HenriksenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Linnea FermDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ib Jarle ChristensenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas ReinertDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole Halfdan LarsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hans Jørgen NielsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Claus Lindbjerg AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-2103
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has spurred much interest as a biomarker in oncology. However, inter- and intra-individual cfDNA levels vary greatly. Consequently, in order to base clinical decisions on cfDNA measurements, normal reference intervals are essential to avoid that ordinary variation is confused with clinically relevant change. The lack of reference intervals may potentially explain the ambiguous results reported in the field. Our study aimed to establish reference intervals and to evaluate the association between cfDNA and demographic and clinical variables, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Plasma samples and clinical data from 2817 subjects were collected including 1930 noncancer individuals and 887 CRC patients. cfDNA was measured using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The large cohort combined with robust cfDNA quantification enabled establishment of reference intervals (<67 years: 775-4860 copies/mL; ≥67 years: 807-6561 copies/mL). A cfDNA level above the age-stratified 90% percentile was prognostic of reduced survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, with HR values of 2.56 and 2.01, respectively. Moreover, cfDNA levels increased significantly with age, elevated BMI and chronic diseases. In CRC, the cfDNA level was increased for Stage IV, but not Stage I to Stage III cancer. In summary, the use of reference intervals revealed that high cfDNA levels were predictive of shorter survival in both noncancer individuals and CRC patients, and that CRC development did not affect the cfDNA level until metastatic dissemination. Furthermore, cfDNA levels were impacted by age and chronic diseases. Conclusively, our study presents reference intervals that will help pave the way for clinical utilization of cfDNA.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBody Mass IndexCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPolymerase Chain ReactionPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic Acidsbiomarkercirculating cell-free DNAcolorectal canceroverall survivalreference intervals

Identifiers

PMID33320961
PMCPMC7898909
OpenAlexW3114979176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.