ArticlePloS one2020
Quantitative measurements of aerosols from air-polishing and ultrasonic devices: (How) can we protect ourselves?
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of implementation status and influencing factors of standard infection control methods for dental environmental surfaces by dental hygienists in South Korea: a questionnaire-based study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Visualisation of Droplet Flow Induced by Ultrasonic Dental Cleaning.International dental journal · 2024Article
- Bacterial contamination of air and surfaces during dental procedures-An experimental pilot study usingInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Article
- Bacterial contamination potential of personal protective equipment itself in dental aerosol-producing treatments.Odontology · 2024Review
- Study of aerosol dispersion and control in dental practice.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Waterline Disinfectants Reduce Dental Bioaerosols: A Multitracer Validation.Journal of dental research · 2022Article
- Influence of flow rate and different size of suction cannulas on splatter contamination in dentistry: results of an exploratory study with a high-volume evacuation system.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Simulated and clinical aerosol spread in common periodontal aerosol-generating procedures.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies among dental teams in Germany.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Effect of spray air settings of speed-increasing contra-angle handpieces on intrapulpal temperatures, drilling times, and coolant spray pattern.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Characterization and mitigation of aerosols and spatters from ultrasonic scalers.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2021Article
- Size-resolved spatial distribution analysis of aerosols with or without the utilization of a novel aerosol containment device in dental settings.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Article
- Article
- Computer simulation of the SARS-CoV-2 contamination risk in a large dental clinic.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2021Article
- Spray mist reduction by means of a high-volume evacuation system-Results of an experimental study.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the distribution and deposition of aerosols during simulated periodontal therapy.
methodsA manikin with simulated fluorescein salivation was treated by four experienced dentists applying two different periodontal treatment options, i.e. air-polishing with an airflow device or ultrasonic scaling in the upper and lower anterior front for 5 minutes, respectively. Aerosol deposition was quantitatively measured on 21 pre-defined locations with varying distances to the manikins mouth in triplicates using absorbent filter papers.
resultsThe selected periodontal interventions resulted in different contamination levels around the patient's mouth. The highest contamination could be measured on probes on the patient's chest and forehead but also on the practitioner's glove. With increasing distance to the working site contamination of the probes decreased with both devices. Air-polishing led to greater contamination than ultrasonic.
conclusionBoth devices showed contamination of the nearby structures, less contamination was detected when using the ultrasonic. Affirming the value of wearing protective equipment we support the need for universal barrier precautions and effective routine infection control in dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.