ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Exact neural mass model for synaptic-based working memory.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biophysically inspired mean-field model of neuronal populations driven by ion-exchange mechanisms.eLife · 2026Article
- Emergence and maintenance of modularity in neural networks with Hebbian and anti-Hebbian inhibitory STDP.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Whole brain functional connectivity: Insights from next generation neural mass modelling incorporating electrical synapses.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Neurophysiological avenues to better conceptualizing adaptive cognition.Communications biology · 2024Article
- How synaptic function controls critical transitions in spiking neuron networks: insight from a Kuramoto model reduction.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- Bridging functional and anatomical neural connectivity through cluster synchronization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mean-Field Approximations With Adaptive Coupling for Networks With Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity.Neural computation · 2023Article
- Robust and brain-like working memory through short-term synaptic plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Interneuronal network model of theta-nested fast oscillations predicts differential effects of heterogeneity, gap junctions and short term depression for hyperpolarizing versus shunting inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Mesoscopic description of hippocampal replay and metastability in spiking neural networks with short-term plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Simulations of working memory spiking networks driven by short-term plasticity.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
- Editorial: From Structure to Function in Neuronal Networks: Effects of Adaptation, Time-Delays, and Noise.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- A model of metabolic supply-demand mismatch leading to secondary brain injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Patient-Specific Network Connectivity Combined With a Next Generation Neural Mass Model to Test Clinical Hypothesis of Seizure Propagation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A synaptic theory of Working Memory (WM) has been developed in the last decade as a possible alternative to the persistent spiking paradigm. In this context, we have developed a neural mass model able to reproduce exactly the dynamics of heterogeneous spiking neural networks encompassing realistic cellular mechanisms for short-term synaptic plasticity. This population model reproduces the macroscopic dynamics of the network in terms of the firing rate and the mean membrane potential. The latter quantity allows us to gain insight of the Local Field Potential and electroencephalographic signals measured during WM tasks to characterize the brain activity. More specifically synaptic facilitation and depression integrate each other to efficiently mimic WM operations via either synaptic reactivation or persistent activity. Memory access and loading are related to stimulus-locked transient oscillations followed by a steady-state activity in the β-γ band, thus resembling what is observed in the cortex during vibrotactile stimuli in humans and object recognition in monkeys. Memory juggling and competition emerge already by loading only two items. However more items can be stored in WM by considering neural architectures composed of multiple excitatory populations and a common inhibitory pool. Memory capacity depends strongly on the presentation rate of the items and it maximizes for an optimal frequency range. In particular we provide an analytic expression for the maximal memory capacity. Furthermore, the mean membrane potential turns out to be a suitable proxy to measure the memory load, analogously to event driven potentials in experiments on humans. Finally we show that the γ power increases with the number of loaded items, as reported in many experiments, while θ and β power reveal non monotonic behaviours. In particular, β and γ rhythms are crucially sustained by the inhibitory activity, while the θ rhythm is controlled by excitatory synapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.