ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
A mechanistic framework for a priori pharmacokinetic predictions of orally inhaled drugs.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of inflammation on drug transporter expression in human airway epithelia: Implications for inhaled drug pharmacokinetics.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2026Article
- Spatial Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling in Airway Mucus.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Article
- A Unified Whole Lung PBK Model for Inhalational Uptake of Gases and Aerosols in Men.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dry Powder and Nebulized Formulations of Orally Inhaled TMEM16A Potentiator GDC-6988.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Translational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Predict Human Pulmonary Kinetics After Lung Delivery.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Predicting Maternal and Infant Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure in Lactating Cannabis Users: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Physiologically Based Modelling Framework for Prediction of Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobial Target Site Concentrations.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Article
- Predicting Regional Respiratory Tissue and Systemic Concentrations of Orally Inhaled Drugs through a Novel PBPK Model.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022Article
- Inferring pulmonary exposure based on clinical PK data: accuracy and precision of model-based deconvolution methods.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fate of orally inhaled drugs is determined by pulmonary pharmacokinetic processes such as particle deposition, pulmonary drug dissolution, and mucociliary clearance. Even though each single process has been systematically investigated, a quantitative understanding on the interaction of processes remains limited and therefore identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics for orally inhaled drugs is still challenging. To investigate this complex interplay, the pulmonary processes can be integrated into mathematical models. However, existing modeling attempts considerably simplify these processes or are not systematically evaluated against (clinical) data. In this work, we developed a mathematical framework based on physiologically-structured population equations to integrate all relevant pulmonary processes mechanistically. A tailored numerical resolution strategy was chosen and the mechanistic model was evaluated systematically against data from different clinical studies. Without adapting the mechanistic model or estimating kinetic parameters based on individual study data, the developed model was able to predict simultaneously (i) lung retention profiles of inhaled insoluble particles, (ii) particle size-dependent pharmacokinetics of inhaled monodisperse particles, (iii) pharmacokinetic differences between inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide, as well as (iv) pharmacokinetic differences between healthy volunteers and asthmatic patients. Finally, to identify the most impactful optimization criteria for orally inhaled drugs, the developed mechanistic model was applied to investigate the impact of input parameters on both the pulmonary and systemic exposure. Interestingly, the solubility of the inhaled drug did not have any relevant impact on the local and systemic pharmacokinetics. Instead, the pulmonary dissolution rate, the particle size, the tissue affinity, and the systemic clearance were the most impactful potential optimization parameters. In the future, the developed prediction framework should be considered a powerful tool for identifying optimal drug and formulation characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.