Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320825›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Rapid COVID-19 Screening Based on Self-Reported Symptoms: Psychometric Assessment and Validation of the EPICOVID19 Short Diagnostic Scale.

Luca Bastiani, Loredana Fortunato, Stefania Pieroni, Fabrizio Bianchi, Fulvio Adorni, Federica Prinelli, Andrea Giacomelli, Gabriele Pagani, Stefania Maggi, Caterina Trevisan and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Taste loss as a distinct symptom of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Luca BastianiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-7362
Loredana FortunatoInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9751-9188
Stefania PieroniInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-4967
Fabrizio BianchiInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3459-9301
Fulvio AdorniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6264-6876
Federica PrinelliInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9093-7643
Andrea GiacomelliInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-4289
Gabriele PaganiInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-7543
Stefania MaggiInstitute of Neuroscience, Aging Branch, National Research Council, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0453-8663
Caterina TrevisanGeriatric Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9221-6997
Marianna NoaleInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7115-139X
Nithiya JesuthasanInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-7234
Aleksandra SojicInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-4511
Carla PettenatiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8113-2886
Massimo AndreoniInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of System Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3205-9758
Raffaele Antonelli IncalziUnit of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Biomedical Campus of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2100-2075
Massimo GalliInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8887-6215
Sabrina MolinaroInstitute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-0873
Institute of Biomedical Technologies · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITLuigi Sacco Hospital · ITNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConfirmed COVID-19 cases have been registered in more than 200 countries, and as of July 28, 2020, over 16 million cases have been reported to the World Health Organization. This study was conducted during the epidemic peak of COVID-19 in Italy. The early identification of individuals with suspected COVID-19 is critical in immediately quarantining such individuals. Although surveys are widely used for identifying COVID-19 cases, outcomes, and associated risks, no validated epidemiological tool exists for surveying SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population.

objectiveWe evaluated the capability of self-reported symptoms in discriminating COVID-19 to identify individuals who need to undergo instrumental measurements. We defined and validated a method for identifying a cutoff score.

methodsOur study is phase II of the EPICOVID19 Italian national survey, which launched in April 2020 and included a convenience sample of 201,121 adults who completed the EPICOVID19 questionnaire. The Phase II questionnaire, which focused on the results of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and serological tests, was mailed to all subjects who previously underwent NPS tests.

resultsOf 2703 subjects who completed the Phase II questionnaire, 694 (25.7%) were NPS positive. Of the 472 subjects who underwent the immunoglobulin G (IgG) test and 421 who underwent the immunoglobulin M test, 22.9% (108/472) and 11.6% (49/421) tested positive, respectively. Compared to NPS-negative subjects, NPS-positive subjects had a higher incidence of fever (421/694, 60.7% vs 391/2009, 19.5%; P<.001), loss of taste and smell (365/694, 52.6% vs 239/2009, 11.9%; P<.001), and cough (352/694, 50.7% vs 580/2009, 28.9%; P<.001). With regard to subjects who underwent serological tests, IgG-positive subjects had a higher incidence of fever (65/108, 60.2% vs 43/364, 11.8%; P<.001) and pain in muscles/bones/joints (73/108, 67.6% vs 71/364, 19.5%; P<.001) than IgG-negative subjects. An analysis of self-reported COVID-19 symptom items revealed a 1-factor solution, the EPICOVID19 diagnostic scale. The following optimal scores were identified: 1.03 for respiratory problems, 1.07 for chest pain, 0.97 for loss of taste and smell 0.97, and 1.05 for tachycardia (ie, heart palpitations). These were the most important symptoms. For adults aged 18-84 years, the cutoff score was 2.56 (sensitivity: 76.56%; specificity: 68.24%) for NPS-positive subjects and 2.59 (sensitivity: 80.37%; specificity: 80.17%) for IgG-positive subjects. For subjects aged ≥60 years, the cutoff score was 1.28, and accuracy based on the presence of IgG antibodies improved (sensitivity: 88.00%; specificity: 89.58%).

conclusionsWe developed a short diagnostic scale to detect subjects with symptoms that were potentially associated with COVID-19 from a wide population. Our results support the potential of self-reported symptoms in identifying individuals who require immediate clinical evaluations. Although these results come from the Italian pandemic period, this short diagnostic scale could be optimized and tested as a screening tool for future similar pandemics.

Indexed as

Health SurveysPsychometricsSelf ReportAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleFeverHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MItalyMaleMass ScreeningImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MalgorithmassessmentCOVID-19diagnosticdiagnostic scalescreeningsurveysymptomvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33320825
PMCPMC7790735
OpenAlexW3089591668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.