ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021
Tissue engineering of the larynx: A contemporary review.
Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional in vitro models in head and neck cancer: current trends and applications.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Tissue-Engineered Implant for Hemilaryngectomy Reconstruction with Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Novel COVID-19 biomarkers identified through multi-omics data analysis: N-acetyl-4-O-acetylneuraminic acid, N-acetyl-L-alanine, N-acetyltriptophan, palmitoylcarnitine, and glycerol 1-myristate.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Auricular Chondrocytes as a Cell Source for Scaffold-Free Elastic Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2024Article
- 3D Printing in Otolaryngology Surgery: Descriptive Review of Literature to Define the State of the Art.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Tissue engineering of the larynx: A contemporary review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTissue engineering has been a topic of extensive research in recent years and has been applied to the regeneration and restoration of many organs including the larynx. Currently, research investigating tissue engineering of the larynx is either ongoing or in the preclinical trial stage.
methodsA literature search was performed on the Advanced search field of PubMed using the keywords: "(laryncheal tissue engineering) AND (cartilage regeneration OR scaffolds OR stem cells OR biomolecules)." After applying the selection criteria, 65 articles were included in the study.
resultsThe present review focuses on the rapidly expanding field of tissue-engineered larynx, which aims to provide stem cell-based scaffolds combined with biological active factors such as growth factors for larynx reconstruction and regeneration. The trend in recent studies is to use new techniques for scaffold construction, such as 3D printing, are developed. All of these strategies have been instrumental in guiding optimization of the tissue-engineered larynx, leading to a level of clinical induction beyond the in vivo animal experimental phase.
conclusionsThis review summarizes the current progress and outlines the necessary basic components of regenerative laryngeal medicine in preclinical fields. Finally, it considers the design of scaffolds, support of growth factors, and cell therapies toward potential clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.