Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320294›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

Collateral damage of the COVID-19 pandemic: an alarming decline in critical procedures in otorhinolaryngology in a German university hospital.

Sarah Riemann, Iva Speck, Kathrin Gerstacker, Christoph Becker, Andreas Knopf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer.Infection and drug resistance · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah RiemannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. sarah.riemann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-9794
Iva SpeckDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Kathrin GerstackerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph BeckerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas KnopfDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Freiburg, Killianstraße 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has a major impact on the diagnosis and treatment of ENT patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the pandemic on the number of otolaryngological procedures, particularly for critical diagnoses with potential negative effects due to prolonged symptom duration.

methodsWe evaluated 10,716 surgical procedures between January 1, 2018 and May 31, 2020, focusing on the 16-week period around March 16, 2020, which includes 1080 observations. We further analyzed subsets of critical procedures.

resultsWe found a decline in critical procedures by 43% although no critical procedures were postponed by the hospital. Meanwhile, the share of critical procedures increased up to 90% caused by the cancellation of elective surgery. Especially worrisome was that diagnostic procedures for suspected malignancies decreased by 41% during the pandemic.

conclusionThe decline in critical procedures in otorhinolaryngology as collateral damage of the COVID-19 pandemic is considerable and therefore alarming.

Indexed as

COVID-19OtolaryngologyHospitals, UniversityHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CancerCoronavirusENTHead and neck surgeryOncology

Identifiers

PMID33320294
PMCPMC7736669
OpenAlexW3111657928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.