Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320288›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2020

[Histomorphological and molecular-pathological prognostic factors in colorectal cancer].

K Erlenbach-Wünsch

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K Erlenbach-WünschPathologisches Institut, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland. katharina.erlenbach-wuensch@uk-erlangen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal carcinomas are the second most common cancer and cause of cancer death in Germany for both men and women. Different aspects of morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathological prognostic factors of colorectal carcinomas and their precursors were investigated. We demonstrated the prognostic relevance and importance of a precise classification of pericolonic tumor deposits (PTDs) in the pT category of the TNM classification. Furthermore, we demonstrated that patients with regional lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal carcinomas with ypN0 status do not have a worse prognosis than patients without signs of preoperative lymph node metastases.Molecular pathological examinations of so-called serrated colorectal fibroblastic polyps as possible precursor lesions of colorectal carcinomas showed that their epithelial area represents a true neoplastic component and thus allows for their consideration in the context of a risk assessment for colorectal carcinomas.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGermanyHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBRAF mutationColorectal carcinomaPrognostic factorsPrognostic indicatorsPTDypN0

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.