Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320264›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Patient-Reported Experiences of Discrimination in the US Health Care System.

Paige Nong, Minakshi Raj, Melissa Creary, Sharon L R Kardia, Jodyn E Platt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. When Nurses Witness Discrimination: Epistemological Silence and the Nursing Justice Reflexivity Framework.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Discrimination and Mental Health: Influence of Structural Racism.Journal of marital and family therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Racial and Demographic Differences in Use of a Trauma Center Confidential Status Policy.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Racial and Sex Differences in Postoperative Mortality Between Patients With Versus Without Dementia.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceived Discrimination Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Introducing theJournal of marriage and the family · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paige NongDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Minakshi RajDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign.
Melissa CrearyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Sharon L R KardiaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Jodyn E PlattDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

The Lifecycle of Health Data: Polices and PracticesR01CA214829 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KARDIA, SHARON L, PLATT, JODYN ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2021
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although considerable evidence exists on the association between negative health outcomes and daily experiences of discrimination, less is known about such experiences in the health care system at the national level. It is critically necessary to measure and address discrimination in the health care system to mitigate harm to patients and as part of the larger ongoing project of responding to health inequities. Objectives: To (1) identify the national prevalence of patient-reported experiences of discrimination in the health care system, the frequency with which they occur, and the main types of discrimination experienced and (2) examine differences in the prevalence of discrimination across demographic groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional national survey fielded online in May 2019 used a general population sample from the National Opinion Research Center's AmeriSpeak Panel. Surveys were sent to 3253 US adults aged 21 years or older, including oversamples of African American respondents, Hispanic respondents, and respondents with annual household incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level. Main Outcomes and Measures: Analyses drew on 3 survey items measuring patient-reported experiences of discrimination, the primary types of discrimination experienced, the frequency with which they occurred, and the demographic and health-related characteristics of the respondents. Weighted bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to assess associations between experiences of discrimination and several demographic and health-related characteristics. Results: Of 2137 US adult respondents who completed the survey (66.3% response rate; unweighted 51.0% female; mean [SD] age, 49.6 [16.3] years), 458 (21.4%) reported that they had experienced discrimination in the health care system. After applying weights to generate population-level estimates, most of those who had experienced discrimination (330 [72.0%]) reported experiencing it more than once. Of 458 reporting experiences of discrimination, racial/ethnic discrimination was the most common type (79 [17.3%]), followed by discrimination based on educational or income level (59 [12.9%]), weight (53 [11.6%]), sex (52 [11.4%]), and age (44 [9.6%]). In multivariable analysis, the odds of experiencing discrimination were higher for respondents who identified as female (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.50-2.36) and lower for older respondents (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99), respondents earning at least $50 000 in annual household income (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95), and those reporting good (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75) or excellent (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.56) health compared with poor or fair health. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that experiences of discrimination in the health care system appear more common than previously recognized and deserve considerable attention. These findings contribute to understanding of the scale at which interpersonal discrimination occurs in the US health care system and provide crucial evidence for next steps in assessing the risks and consequences of such discrimination. The findings also point to a need for further analysis of how interpersonal discrimination interacts with structural inequities and social determinants of health to build effective responses.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareSocial Determinants of HealthSocial DiscriminationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33320264
PMCPMC7739133
OpenAlexW3111163773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.