Understanding and Measuring the Value of Peer-to-Peer Community Support Programs for Older Adults.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparing In-Person Versus Self-Paced Polypharmacy Education in Older Adults: A Pragmatic Comparison of Delivery Format Effectiveness.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
   Trial
2. Beyond Neighbors: Social Capital and Self-Empowerment Among Older Adults Diagnosed with HIV Late.AIDS and behavior · 2026
   Article
3. A core competency framework for mental health peer supporters of older adults in a Chinese community: cross-culturally informed Delphi study.BJPsych bulletin · 2024
   Article
4. Volunteer peer support frameworks supporting older women living alone.Health & social care in the community · 2022
   Article
5. Peer-to-Peer Support and Changes in Health and Well-being in Older Adults Over Time.JAMA network open · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Support and Health Care Utilization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.2020

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as