Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33320055›Full record

ArticleMemory (Hove, England)2021

Age-related differences in adults' ability to follow spoken instructions.

Agnieszka J Jaroslawska, Glen Bartup, Alicia Forsberg, Joni Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory (Hove, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Translating words into actions in working memory: The role of spatial-motoric coding.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnieszka J JaroslawskaThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1358-7512
Glen BartupThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alicia ForsbergThe University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Joni HolmesMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_A060_1103Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research illustrates that working memory capacity is a crucial limiting factor in our ability to follow spoken instructions. Despite the ubiquitous nature of instruction following throughout the lifespan, how the natural ageing process affects the ability to do so is not yet fully understood. In this study, we investigated the consequences of action at encoding and recall on the ability to follow spoken instructions. Younger (< 30 y/o) and older (> 65 y/o) adults recalled sequences of spoken action commands under presentation and recall conditions that either did or did not involve their physical performance. Both groups showed an enacted-recall advantage, with superior recall by physical performance than oral repetition. When both encoding and recall were purely verbal, older adults' recall accuracy was comparable to that of their younger counterparts. When action was involved at either encoding or recall, however, the difference in performance between the two age groups became pronounced: enactment-based encoding significantly improved younger adults' ability to follow spoken instructions; there was no such advantage for older adults. These data show that spatial-motoric representations disproportionately benefit younger adults' memory performance. We discuss the practical implications of these findings in the context of lifelong learning.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallAgedAgingCognitionHumansLearningaction advantageageingenactmentfollowing instructionsworking memory

Identifiers

PMID33320055
PMCPMC7613123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.