Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319910›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2020

Making experimental data tables in the life sciences more FAIR: a pragmatic approach.

Daniel Jacob, Romain David, Sophie Aubin, Yves Gibon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An approach to making life sciences FAIR-FAIR-DS as a tool for Aspergillus fumigatus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Metabolite quantification data based onBMC research notes · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Data Shepherding in Nanotechnology. The Initiation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel JacobINRAE, Université de Bordeaux, UMR BFP, 71 av E Bourlaux, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France.
Romain DavidINRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, UMR MISTEA, 2 place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 2, France.
Sophie AubinINRAE, DipSO, 42 rue Georges Morel, 49070 Beaucouzé, France.
Yves GibonINRAE, Université de Bordeaux, UMR BFP, 71 av E Bourlaux, 33140 Villenave d'Ornon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making data compliant with the FAIR Data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) is still a challenge for many researchers, who are not sure which criteria should be met first and how. Illustrated with experimental data tables associated with a Design of Experiments, we propose an approach that can serve as a model for research data management that allows researchers to disseminate their data by satisfying the main FAIR criteria without insurmountable efforts. More importantly, this approach aims to facilitate the FAIR compliance process by providing researchers with tools to improve their data management practices.

Indexed as

Biological Science Disciplinesexperimental data tablesFAIR assessmentFAIR Data principlesresearch data management

Identifiers

PMID33319910
PMCPMC7736789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.