Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319865›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2020

Evolution and expansion of the RUNX2 QA repeat corresponds with the emergence of vertebrate complexity.

Axel H Newton, Andrew J Pask

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulatory diversification of conservedZoological research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A novelHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evolutionary mechanisms modulating the mammalian skull development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Axel H NewtonBiosciences 4, The School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. axel.newton@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-5978
Andrew J PaskBiosciences 4, The School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) is critical for the development of the vertebrate bony skeleton. Unlike other RUNX family members, RUNX2 possesses a variable poly-glutamine, poly-alanine (QA) repeat domain. Natural variation within this repeat is able to alter the transactivation potential of RUNX2, acting as an evolutionary 'tuning knob' suggested to influence mammalian skull shape. However, the broader role of the RUNX2 QA repeat throughout vertebrate evolution is unknown. In this perspective, we examine the role of the RUNX2 QA repeat during skeletal development and discuss how its emergence and expansion may have facilitated the evolution of morphological novelty in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitHumansMammalsMultigene FamilyOpen Reading FramesOsteogenesisPhylogenyVertebratesCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 Subunit

Identifiers

PMID33319865
PMCPMC7738678
OpenAlexW3113321050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.