Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319863›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Unequal contribution of two paralogous CENH3 variants in cowpea centromere function.

Takayoshi Ishii, Martina Juranić, Shamoni Maheshwari, Fernanda de Oliveira Bustamante, Maximilian Vogt, Rigel Salinas-Gamboa, Steven Dreissig, Nial Gursanscky, Tracy How, Dmitri Demidov and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Retention of a singlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Takayoshi IshiiLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany. Ishii.T@tottori-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6370-3289
Martina JuranićCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6113-7623
Shamoni MaheshwariPlant Biology Department and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Fernanda de Oliveira BustamanteLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Maximilian VogtLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Rigel Salinas-GamboaUGA Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Mexico.
Steven DreissigLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Nial GursansckyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.
Tracy HowCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.
Dmitri DemidovLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Joerg FuchsLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Veit SchubertLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany.
Andrew SpriggsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-8588
Jean-Philippe Vielle-CalzadaUGA Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Mexico.
Luca ComaiPlant Biology Department and Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Anna M G KoltunowCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-7683
Andreas HoubenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466, Seeland, Germany. houben@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-239X
Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DECommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUCarnegie Department of Plant Biology · USCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXETH Zurich · CHUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1076280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most diploids the centromere-specific histone H3 (CENH3), the assembly site of active centromeres, is encoded by a single copy gene. Persistance of two CENH3 paralogs in diploids species raises the possibility of subfunctionalization. Here we analysed both CENH3 genes of the  diploid dryland crop cowpea. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that gene duplication of CENH3 occurred independently during the speciation of Vigna unguiculata. Both functional CENH3 variants are transcribed, and the corresponding proteins are intermingled in subdomains of different types of centromere sequences in a tissue-specific manner together with the kinetochore protein CENPC. CENH3.2 is removed from the generative cell of mature pollen, while CENH3.1 persists. CRISPR/Cas9-based inactivation of CENH3.1 resulted in delayed vegetative growth and sterility, indicating that this variant is needed for plant development and reproduction. By contrast, CENH3.2 knockout individuals did not show obvious defects during vegetative and reproductive development. Hence, CENH3.2 of cowpea is likely at an early stage of pseudogenization and less likely undergoing subfunctionalization.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationCentromereCentromere Protein AEvolution, MolecularFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOrgan SpecificityPhenotypePhylogenyPlant ProteinsVignaCentromere Protein APlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33319863
PMCPMC7738545
OpenAlexW3112756453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.