Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319857›Full record

ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2020

Distinct genomic profiles of gestational choriocarcinoma, a unique cancer of pregnant tissues.

Seung-Hyun Jung, Youn Jin Choi, Min Sung Kim, Hyeon-Chun Park, Mi-Ryung Han, Soo Young Hur, Ah Won Lee, Ok Ran Shin, Jeana Kim, Sung Hak Lee and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SMARCD1 and Its Functional Relevance in SWI/SNF and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Overview of the Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Human Choriocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Seung-Hyun Jung *Cancer Evolution Research Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Youn Jin Choi *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Min Sung KimCancer Evolution Research Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Hyeon-Chun ParkIntegrated Research Center for Genome Polymorphism, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Mi-Ryung HanDepartment of Microbiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Soo Young HurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ah Won LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Ok Ran ShinDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Jeana KimDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Hak LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Dongwan HongCancer Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-1299
Sang Yong SongDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeun-Jun ChungIntegrated Research Center for Genome Polymorphism, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. yejun@catholic.ac.kr.
Sug Hyung LeeCancer Evolution Research Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. suhulee@catholic.ac.kr.
Catholic University of Korea · KRSuwon Catholic University · KRIncheon National University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2017R1A2B2002314National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2017R1E1A1A01074913National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2019R1C1C1004909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about genomic alterations of gestational choriocarcinoma (GC), unique cancer that originates in pregnant tissues, and the progression mechanisms from the nonmalignant complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) to GC. Whole-exome sequencing (20 GCs) and/or single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (29 GCs) were performed. We analyzed copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in 29 GCs that exhibited androgenetic CN-LOHs (20 monospermic, 8 dispermic) and no CN-LOH (one with NLRP7 mutation). Most GCs (25/29) harboring recurrent copy number alterations (CNAs) and gains on 1q21.1-q44 were significantly associated with poor prognosis. We detected five driver mutations in the GCs, most of which were chromatin remodeling gene (ARID1A, SMARCD1, and EP300) mutations but not in common cancer genes such as TP53 and KRAS. One patient's serial CHM/invasive mole/GC showed consistent CN-LOHs, but only the GC harbored CNAs, indicating that CN-LOH is an early pivotal event in HM-IM-GC development, and CNAs may be a late event that promotes CHM progression to GC. Our data indicate that GCs have unique profiles of CN-LOHs, mutations and CNAs that together differentiate GCs from non-GCs. Practically, CN-LOH and CNA profiles are useful for the molecular diagnosis of GC and the selection of GC patients with poor prognosis for more intensive treatments, respectively.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomicsAllelesChoriocarcinomaDisease SusceptibilityDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansLoss of HeterozygosityMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyUterine Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33319857
PMCPMC8080714
OpenAlexW3112862874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.