Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319803›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

DNA metabarcoding uncovers fungal diversity in soils of protected and non-protected areas on Deception Island, Antarctica.

Luiz Henrique Rosa, Thamar Holanda da Silva, Mayara Baptistucci Ogaki, Otávio Henrique Bezerra Pinto, Michael Stech, Peter Convey, Micheline Carvalho-Silva, Carlos Augusto Rosa, Paulo E A S Câmara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fungal diversity present in ornithogenic soils of extreme equatorial Atlantic São Pedro and São Paulo archipelago using DNA metabarcoding.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in accumulated snow and exposed sediments across Antarctic Islands.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luiz Henrique RosaLaboratório de Microbiologia Polar & Conexões Tropicais, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, P. O. Box 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil. lhrosa@icb.ufmg.br.
Thamar Holanda da SilvaLaboratório de Microbiologia Polar & Conexões Tropicais, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, P. O. Box 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil.
Mayara Baptistucci OgakiLaboratório de Microbiologia Polar & Conexões Tropicais, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, P. O. Box 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil.
Otávio Henrique Bezerra PintoDepartamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Michael StechNaturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Peter ConveyBritish Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
Micheline Carvalho-SilvaDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto RosaLaboratório de Microbiologia Polar & Conexões Tropicais, Departamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, P. O. Box 486, Belo Horizonte, MG, CEP 31270-901, Brazil.
Paulo E A S CâmaraDepartamento de Botânica, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed soil fungal diversity at two sites on Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica using DNA metabarcoding analysis. The first site was a relatively undisturbed area, and the second was much more heavily impacted by research and tourism. We detected 346 fungal amplicon sequence variants dominated by the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota and Chytridiomycota. We also detected taxa belonging to the rare phyla Mucoromycota and Rozellomycota, which have been difficult to detect in Antarctica by traditional isolation methods. Cladosporium sp., Pseudogymnoascus roseus, Leotiomycetes sp. 2, Penicillium sp., Mortierella sp. 1, Mortierella sp. 2, Pseudogymnoascus appendiculatus and Pseudogymnoascus sp. were the most dominant fungi. In addition, 440,153 of the total of 1,214,875 reads detected could be classified only at the level of Fungi. In both sampling areas the DNA of opportunistic, phytopathogenic and symbiotic fungi were detected, which might have been introduced by human activities, transported by birds or wind, and/or represent resident fungi not previously reported from Antarctica. Further long-term studies are required to elucidate how biological colonization in the island may be affected by climatic changes and/or other anthropogenic influences.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicIslandsSoil MicrobiologyAntarctic RegionsFungiSatellite Communications

Identifiers

PMID33319803
PMCPMC7738542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.