Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Linking morphological and molecular sources to disentangle the case of Xylodon australis.

Javier Fernández-López, M Teresa Telleria, Margarita Dueñas, Mara Laguna-Castro, Klaus Schliep, María P Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revisiting the genusMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Javier Fernández-LópezDepartment of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain. jflopez@rjb.csic.es.
M Teresa TelleriaDepartment of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita DueñasDepartment of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain.
Mara Laguna-CastroDepartment of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain.
Klaus SchliepGraz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
María P MartínDepartment of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of different sources of evidence has been recommended in order to conduct species delimitation analyses to solve taxonomic issues. In this study, we use a maximum likelihood framework to combine morphological and molecular traits to study the case of Xylodon australis (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) using the locate.yeti function from the phytools R package. Xylodon australis has been considered a single species distributed across Australia, New Zealand and Patagonia. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses were conducted to unmask the actual diversity under X. australis as well as the kinship relations respect their relatives. To assess the taxonomic position of each clade, locate.yeti function was used to locate in a molecular phylogeny the X. australis type material for which no molecular data was available using morphological continuous traits. Two different species were distinguished under the X. australis name, one from Australia-New Zealand and other from Patagonia. In addition, a close relationship with Xylodon lenis, a species from the South East of Asia, was confirmed for the Patagonian clade. We discuss the implications of our results for the biogeographical history of this genus and we evaluate the potential of this method to be used with historical collections for which molecular data is not available.

Identifiers

PMID33319784
PMCPMC7738490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.