Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319783›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Integrative analysis of multi-platform reverse-phase protein array data for the pharmacodynamic assessment of response to targeted therapies.

Adam Byron, Stephan Bernhardt, Bérèngere Ouine, Aurélie Cartier, Kenneth G Macleod, Neil O Carragher, Vonick Sibut, Ulrike Korf, Bryan Serrels, Leanne de Koning

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Folinic Acid Improves Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Trial
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Adam ByronCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK. adam.byron@igmm.ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5939-9883
Stephan BernhardtDivision of Molecular Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8817-3672
Bérèngere OuineDepartment of Translational Research, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Aurélie CartierDepartment of Translational Research, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Kenneth G MacleodCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.
Neil O CarragherCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-9747
Vonick SibutU900 INSERM, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Ulrike KorfDivision of Molecular Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Bryan SerrelsCancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1826-4584
Leanne de KoningDepartment of Translational Research, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. leanne.de-koning@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-3633
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRGerman Cancer Research Center · DEInserm · FR

Funding

Cancer Research UK C157/A25140Medical Research Council MR/K017047/1Medical Research Council MR/R015635/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) technology uses panels of high-specificity antibodies to measure proteins and protein post-translational modifications in cells and tissues. The approach offers sensitive and precise quantification of large numbers of samples and has thus found applications in the analysis of clinical and pre-clinical samples. For effective integration into drug development and clinical practice, robust assays with consistent results are essential. Leveraging a collaborative RPPA model, we set out to assess the variability between three different RPPA platforms using distinct instrument set-ups and workflows. Employing multiple RPPA-based approaches operated across distinct laboratories, we characterised a range of human breast cancer cells and their protein-level responses to two clinically relevant cancer drugs. We integrated multi-platform RPPA data and used unsupervised learning to identify protein expression and phosphorylation signatures that were not dependent on RPPA platform and analysis workflow. Our findings indicate that proteomic analyses of cancer cell lines using different RPPA platforms can identify concordant profiles of response to pharmacological inhibition, including when using different antibodies to measure the same target antigens. These results highlight the robustness and the reproducibility of RPPA technology and its capacity to identify protein markers of disease or response to therapy.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein Array AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33319783
PMCPMC7738515
OpenAlexW3110788338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.