Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319780›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation.

R Nathan Spreng, Emile Dimas, Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, Alain Dagher, Philipp Koellinger, Gideon Nave, Anthony Ong, Julius M Kernbach, Thomas V Wiecki, Tian Ge and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurobiology of loneliness: a systematic review.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

R Nathan SprengLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. nathan.spreng@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-8916
Emile DimasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Laetitia Mwilambwe-TshiloboLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, Montreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Alain DagherMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-5779
Philipp KoellingerSchool of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7413-0412
Gideon NaveMarketing Department, the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-5630
Anthony OngDepartment of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Julius M KernbachDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen (NAILA), RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas V WieckiQuantopian Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Tian GePsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Yue LiSchool of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1163-3634
Avram J HolmesDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CA, 06520, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6583-803X
B T Thomas YeoDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Centre for Sleep & Cognition, Clinical Imaging Research Centre, N.1 Institute for Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Gary R TurnerDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robin I M DunbarDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9982-9702
Danilo BzdokMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. danilo.bzdok@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-6620
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAMcGill University · CABroad Institute · USCornell University · USNational University of Singapore · SGUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLYale University · USYork University · CA

Funding

Investigating the impact of loneliness on brain aging and pre-symptomatic Alzheimer's disease progressionR01AG068563 · NIA · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI BZDOK, DANILO, SPRENG, ROBERT NATHAN · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
CIHR 438531NIA NIH HHS R01 AG068563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans survive and thrive through social exchange. Yet, social dependency also comes at a cost. Perceived social isolation, or loneliness, affects physical and mental health, cognitive performance, overall life expectancy, and increases vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease-related dementias. Despite severe consequences on behavior and health, the neural basis of loneliness remains elusive. Using the UK Biobank population imaging-genetics cohort (n = ~40,000, aged 40-69 years when recruited, mean age = 54.9), we test for signatures of loneliness in grey matter morphology, intrinsic functional coupling, and fiber tract microstructure. The loneliness-linked neurobiological profiles converge on a collection of brain regions known as the 'default network'. This higher associative network shows more consistent loneliness associations in grey matter volume than other cortical brain networks. Lonely individuals display stronger functional communication in the default network, and greater microstructural integrity of its fornix pathway. The findings fit with the possibility that the up-regulation of these neural circuits supports mentalizing, reminiscence and imagination to fill the social void.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAdultAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBrainBrain MappingFemaleFornix, BrainGray MatterHumansLonelinessMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalSocial Isolation

Identifiers

PMID33319780
PMCPMC7738683
OpenAlexW3111446413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.