Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319341›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2021

Estimating on the fly: The approximate number system in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus).

Mia Corliss, Theo Brown, T Andrew Hurly, Susan D Healy, Maria C Tello-Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Living on the edge: the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mia CorlissSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.
Theo BrownSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.
T Andrew HurlyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.
Susan D HealySchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK. susan.healy@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Maria C Tello-RamosSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When presented with resources that differ in quantity, many animals use a numerosity system to discriminate between them. One taxonomically widespread system is the approximate number system. This is a numerosity system that allows the rapid evaluation of the number of objects in a group and which is regulated by Weber's Law. Here we investigated whether wild, free-living rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) possess an approximate number system. The hummingbirds were presented with two experiments. In the first we investigated whether hummingbirds spontaneously chose an array containing more flowers than an alternate array. In the second we asked whether the hummingbirds could learn to use numerosity as a cue to which of two arrays contained the better reward. The birds did not spontaneously prefer an array containing more flowers. After minimal training, however, they learned to choose the more numerous array and could differentiate between arrays of five and seven flowers. These data support the presence of an approximate number system in the rufous hummingbird. It seems plausible that having such a system would enable much more efficient foraging in this species.

Indexed as

BirdsCuesAnimalsFlowersLearningRewardApproximate number systemForagingNumerosityRufous hummingbird

Identifiers

PMID33319341
PMCPMC7979633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.