Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319317›Full record

SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Using mouse cursor tracking to investigate online cognition: Preserving methodological ingenuity while moving toward reproducible science.

Martin Schoemann, Denis O'Hora, Rick Dale, Stefan Scherbaum

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin SchoemannDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg, 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany. martin.schoemann@tu-dresden.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-4175
Denis O'HoraSchool of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3776-6782
Rick DaleDepartment of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-474X
Stefan ScherbaumDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg, 17, 01069, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4408-6016

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 940/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse cursor tracking has become a prominent method for characterizing cognitive processes, used in a wide variety of domains of psychological science. Researchers have demonstrated considerable ingenuity in the application of the approach, but the methodology has not undergone systematic analysis to facilitate the development of best practices. Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated effects of experimental design features on a number of mousetracking outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the mouse-tracking literature to survey the reporting and spread of mouse variables (Cursor speed, Sampling rate, Training), physical characteristics of the experiments (Stimulus position, Response box position) and response requirements (Start procedure, Response procedure, Response deadline). This survey reveals that there is room for improvement in reporting practices, especially of subtler design features that researchers may have assumed would not impact research results (e.g., Cursor speed). We provide recommendations for future best practices in mouse-tracking studies and consider how best to standardize the mouse-tracking literature without excessively constraining the methodological flexibility that is essential to the field.

Indexed as

CognitionNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceResearch DesignUser-Computer InterfaceHumansExperimental designMouse cursor trackingProcess tracingResponse dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33319317
PMCPMC8219569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.