Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319254›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2021

[Separation anxiety disorder].

M A Schiele, K Domschke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M A SchieleKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstraße 5, 79104, Freiburg, Deutschland. miriam.schiele@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
K DomschkeKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hauptstraße 5, 79104, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) separation anxiety disorder has been included in the chapter on anxiety disorders, thereby removing the age of onset restriction that previously required first onset during childhood or adolescence. Separation anxiety disorder has a lifetime prevalence of 4.8% and onset often occurs after the age of 18 years. Despite the high prevalence, separation anxiety disorder is often underdiagnosed and subsequently remains untreated. This narrative review summarizes the etiology, clinical features, diagnostic criteria as well as important differential diagnostic aspects, common comorbidity profiles and treatment implications of separation anxiety disorder. Furthermore, relevant implications for everyday practice and future perspectives for treatment and research are discussed.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersAnxiety, SeparationAdolescentChildComorbidityDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansPrevalenceAnxiety disordersDiagnosticsRisk factorsSeparation anxietyTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.