Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319197›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Survival Among Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Hemodialysis Patients Who Initiate With an Arteriovenous Fistula.

Purna Mukhopadhyay, Kenneth J Woodside, Douglas E Schaubel, Kaitlyn Repeck, Keith McCullough, Vahakn B Shahinian, Ronald L Pisoni, Rajiv Saran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sickle Cell Disease and CKD: An Update.American journal of nephrology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Purna MukhopadhyayArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kenneth J WoodsideDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Douglas E SchaubelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Kaitlyn RepeckArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Keith McCulloughArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Vahakn B ShahinianDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ronald L PisoniArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rajiv SaranDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveComparisons of outcomes between in-center hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are confounded by selection bias because PD patients are typically younger and healthier and may have received longer predialysis care. We compared first-year survival between what we hypothesized were clinically equivalent groups; namely, patients who initiate maintenance HD using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and those selecting PD as their initial modality. STUDY

designObservational, registry-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING &

participantsUS Renal Data System data for 5 annual cohorts (2010-2014; n = 130,324) of incident HD with an AVF and incident PD patients. EXPOSURES AND PREDICTORS: Exposure was more than 1 day receiving PD or more than 1 day receiving HD with an AVF. Time at risk for both cohorts was determined for 12 consecutive 30-day segments, censoring for transplantation, loss to follow-up, or end of time. Predictors included patient-level characteristics obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2728 Form and other data sources. OUTCOMES: Patient survival. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Unadjusted and multivariable risk-adjusted HRs for death of HD versus PD patients, averaged over 2010 to 2014, were calculated.

resultsThe HD cohort's average unadjusted mortality rate was consistently higher than for the PD cohort. The HR of HD versus PD was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.20-1.30) in the unadjusted model and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87) in the adjusted model. However, multivariable risk-adjusted analyses showed the HR of HD versus PD for the first 90 days was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98-1.14), decreasing to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in the 270- to 360-day period. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding due to selection bias inherent in dialysis modality choice and the observational study design. Form 2728 provides baseline data at dialysis incidence alone, but not over time.

conclusionsUS patients receiving HD with an AVF appear to have a survival advantage over PD patients after 90 days of dialysis initiation after accounting for patient characteristics. These findings have implications in the choice of initial dialysis modality and vascular access for patients.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous fistulachronic kidney diseasehemodialysispatient outcomesperitoneal dialysispre-ESRD careUSRDS

Identifiers

PMID33319197
PMCPMC7729241
OpenAlexW3094525019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.