Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319159›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

The comparison of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction between single-incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A sub-study of a randomized, prospective clinical trial.

Hiroki Ohya, Jun Watanabe, Yusuke Suwa, Hirokazu Suwa, Mayumi Ozawa, Atsushi Ishibe, Shoichi Fujii, Kazumi Kubota, Chikara Kunisaki, Itaru Endo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki OhyaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5215-3960
Jun WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-3664
Yusuke SuwaDepartment of Surgery Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Hirokazu SuwaDepartment of Surgery Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital Yokosuka Japan.
Mayumi OzawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Atsushi IshibeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3658
Shoichi FujiiDepartment of Surgery Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Kazumi KubotaDepartment of Biostatistics Yokohama City University School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.
Chikara KunisakiDepartment of Surgery Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Itaru EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-8114
Yokohama City University · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JPYokosuka Kyosai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe present study clarified the effect on the health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, control trial comparing single-incision and multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. We performed a pre-planned secondary analysis of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction data of 200 patients. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the Japanese 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) version 2.0 before surgery and at 1 month after surgery. Patient satisfaction was compared using seven questionnaires at 1 month after surgery.

resultsOne hundred patients were assigned to each group. After excluding 18 patients (9.0%) who did not complete the SF-36, 182 patients (91.0%) were included in the analysis (92 cases of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and 90 cases of multiport laparoscopic colectomy). The SF-36 scores at 1 month after surgery were not significantly different between the two arms. The role physical, bodily pain, vitality and physical component summary were significantly lower at 1 month after surgery than before in both groups. However, the role emotional was significantly lower after surgery than before only in the single-incision laparoscopic colectomy group. In terms of patient satisfaction at 1 month after surgery, there were no significant differences in any of the seven items on the questionnaire.

conclusionsSingle-incision laparoscopic colectomy was similar to multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy may be inferior than multiport laparoscopic colectomy in terms of the role emotional.

Indexed as

colorectal surgeryhealth‐related quality of lifelaparoscopic surgerypatient satisfactionsingle‐incision

Identifiers

PMID33319159
PMCPMC7726688
OpenAlexW3043964050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.