Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319158›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with multivisceral resection for surgical T4b colon cancer: Comparison with open colectomy.

Masaaki Miyo, Takeshi Kato, Yusuke Takahashi, Masakazu Miyake, Reishi Toshiyama, Takuya Hamakawa, Kenji Sakai, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Atsushi Miyamoto, Motohiro Hirao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Perioperative and oncological outcomes following robotic en bloc multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masaaki MiyoNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-1308
Takeshi KatoNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Yusuke TakahashiNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Masakazu MiyakeNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Reishi ToshiyamaNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takuya HamakawaNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kenji SakaiNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Kazuhiro NishikawaNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Atsushi MiyamotoNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Motohiro HiraoNational Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Osaka National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn response to the rising use of laparoscopic surgery, recent studies have shown that laparoscopic multivisceral resections for locally advanced colon cancer are safe, feasible, and provide acceptable oncological outcomes. However, the usefulness of laparoscopic multivisceral resection remains controversial. Here, we aimed to compare short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open multivisceral resection approaches for treating locally advanced colon cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively collected data on 1315 consecutive patients admitted to the National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, for surgical treatment of colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2017. We assessed invasiveness in terms of operating times, blood loss, and complications. Oncological outcomes included 5-year survival rates and recurrences.

resultsWe included 85 patients that underwent a colectomy with a multivisceral resection for locally advanced colon cancer; of these, 38 were treated with a laparoscopic approach and 47 were treated with an open approach. Compared to the open surgery group, the laparoscopic group had significantly less blood loss (median volume: 25 vs 140 mL,

conclusionA laparoscopic approach for locally advanced colon cancer could be less invasive than an open approach without affecting oncological outcomes in selected patients.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgerylocally advanced colon cancerlong‐term outcomesmultivisceral resectionshort‐term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID33319158
PMCPMC7726680
OpenAlexW3044262793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.