Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319073›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2021

Marker-less online MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases at a 1.5 T MR-Linac - Feasibility, workflow data and patient acceptance.

Cihan Gani, S Boeke, H McNair, J Ehlers, M Nachbar, D Mönnich, A Stolte, J Boldt, C Marks, J Winter and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences and Technologies in Adaptive Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Estimation of secondary cancer projected risk after partial breast irradiation at the 1.5 T MR-linac.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cihan GaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
S BoekeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
H McNairDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
J EhlersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
M NachbarSection for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
D MönnichDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
A StolteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
J BoldtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
C MarksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
J WinterSection for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
Luise A KünzelSection for Biomedical Physics. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
S GatidisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
M BitzerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
D ThorwarthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
D ZipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DERoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health ICA-SCL-2018-04-ST2-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established ablative treatment for liver tumors with excellent local control rates. Magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) provides superior soft tissue contrast and may therefore facilitate a marker-less liver SBRT workflow. The goal of the present study was to investigate feasibility, workflow parameters, toxicity and patient acceptance of MRgSBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

methodsTen consecutive patients with liver metastases treated on a 1.5 T MR-Linac were included in this prospective trial. Tumor delineation was performed on four-dimensional computed tomography scans and both exhale triggered and free-breathing T2 MRI scans from the MR-Linac. An internal target volume based approach was applied. Organ at risk constraints were based on the UKSABR guidelines (Version 6.1). Patient acceptance regarding device specific aspects was assessed and toxicity was scored according to the common toxicity criteria of adverse events, version 5.

resultsNine of ten tumors were clearly visible on the 1.5 T MR-Linac. No patient had fiducial markers placed for treatment. All patients were treated with three or five fractions. Median dose to 98% of the gross tumor volume was 38.5 Gy. The median time from "patient identity check" until "beam-off" was 31 min. Median beam on time was 9.6 min. Online MRgRT was well accepted in general and no treatment had to be interrupted on patient request. No event of symptomatic radiation induced liver disease was observed after a median follow-up of ten month (range 3-17 months).

conclusionOur early experience suggests that online 1.5 T MRgSBRT of liver metastases represents a promising new non-invasive marker-free treatment modality based on high image quality, clinically reasonable in-room times and high patient acceptance. Further studies are necessary to assess clinical outcome, to validate advanced motion management and to explore the benefit of online response adaptive liver SBRT.

Identifiers

PMID33319073
PMCPMC7723999
OpenAlexW3110315206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.