Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319048›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2020

Sorafenib as second-line treatment option after failure of lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tetsu Tomonari, Yasushi Sato, Hironori Tanaka, Takahiro Tanaka, Tatsuya Taniguchi, Msasahiro Sogabe, Koichi Okamoto, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Naoki Muguruma, Tetsuji Takayama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetsu TomonariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-9866
Yasushi SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Hironori TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-0192
Takahiro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tatsuya TaniguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Msasahiro SogabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Koichi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Hiroshi MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Naoki MugurumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tetsuji TakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tokushima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimCurrently, there is no molecular-targeted agent that has demonstrated evidence of efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) who have developed resistance to treatment with lenvatinib (LEN). In this real-world study, we aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib (SOR) in patients with u-HCC after progression on treatment with LEN. METHODS PATIENTS AND

resultsA total of 13 patients with u-HCC (12 males and 1 female), who were treated with SOR after progression on LEN, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated via contrast-enhanced computerized tomography at 8 weeks after the initiation of SOR therapy according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and RECIST. According to mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 15.3% (2/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. According to RECIST, the ORR and DCR were 0% (0/13) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. The median progression-free survival was 4.1 months. The median albumin-bilirubin scores did not deteriorate significantly at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after initiation of SOR, compared with the scores at the baseline. The most frequent grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. There was no incidence of grade 3 AEs.

conclusionTreatment with SOR may be effective for u-HCC after failure on LEN and may not worsen the liver reserve.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomalenvatinibramucirumabregorafenibsorafenib

Identifiers

PMID33319048
PMCPMC7731817
OpenAlexW3049757680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.