ArticleSSM - population health2020
Systematic review of methods used to study the intersecting impact of sex and social locations on health outcomes.
Article in SSM - population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating gender analysis into research: reflections from the Gender-Net Plus workshop.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Relationship between intersectionality and cancer inequalities: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Inequities in home care use among older Canadian adults: Are they corrected by public funding?PloS one · 2023Article
- Exploring the Application of Intersectionality as a Path toward Equity in Perinatal Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Gender differences in access to community-based care: a longitudinal analysis of widowhood and living arrangements.European journal of ageing · 2022Article
- Intersectional inequalities in younger women's experiences of physical intimate partner violence across communities in Bangladesh.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- An investigation of quantitative methods for assessing intersectionality in health research: A systematic review.SSM - population health · 2021Review
- The intersectional impact of sex and social factors on subjective health: analysis of the Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA).BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIndependent health impacts of sex or social circumstances are well-studied, particularly among older adults. Less theorized or examined is how combinations or intersections of these underpin differential health effects. Nevertheless, and often without naming it as such, an intersectional framework aligns with studies of social determinants of health, life-course epidemiology and eco-epidemiology. In this systematic review we examined and aimed to identify research methods used to operationalize, whether intentionally or inadvertently, interconnected effects of sex and social locations on health outcomes for 45+ year olds.
methodsUsing broad search terms, numerous databases, and following Prisma guidelines, 732 of 9214 papers initially identified, met inclusion criteria for full review.
resultsOf the 501 papers included after full review, methods used in considering intersections of sex and social circumstances/location(s) included regression (112 of 365 papers), growth curves (7 of 22), multilevel (15 of 25), decomposition (6 of 9), mediation (10 of 17), structural equation modelling (23 of 25), and other (2 of 3). Most (n = 157) approximated intersectional analyses by including interaction terms or sex-stratifying results. DISCUSSION: Few authors used the inherent strength of some study methods to examine intersecting traits. As even fewer began with an intersectionality framework their subsequent failure to deliver cannot be faulted, despite many studies including data and methodologies that would support intersectional analyses. There appeared to be a gap, not in analytic potential but rather in theorizing that differential distributions of social locations describe heterogeneity within the categories 'men' and 'women' that can underlie differential, gendered effects on older adults' health. While SEM, mediation and decomposition analyses emerged as particularly robust methods, the unexpected outcome was finding how few researchers consider intersectionality as a potential predictor of health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.