Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33319029›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2020

Systematic review of methods used to study the intersecting impact of sex and social locations on health outcomes.

S P Phillips, Vafaei A, Yu S, Rodrigues R, Ilinca S, Zolyomi E, Fors S

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Application of Intersectionality as a Path toward Equity in Perinatal Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S P PhillipsFamily Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, 220 Bagot St, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.
Vafaei AFamily Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, 220 Bagot St, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.
Yu SFaculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Rodrigues REuropean Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Austria.
Ilinca SEuropean Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Austria.
Zolyomi EEuropean Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, Austria.
Fors SAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndependent health impacts of sex or social circumstances are well-studied, particularly among older adults. Less theorized or examined is how combinations or intersections of these underpin differential health effects. Nevertheless, and often without naming it as such, an intersectional framework aligns with studies of social determinants of health, life-course epidemiology and eco-epidemiology. In this systematic review we examined and aimed to identify research methods used to operationalize, whether intentionally or inadvertently, interconnected effects of sex and social locations on health outcomes for 45+ year olds.

methodsUsing broad search terms, numerous databases, and following Prisma guidelines, 732 of 9214 papers initially identified, met inclusion criteria for full review.

resultsOf the 501 papers included after full review, methods used in considering intersections of sex and social circumstances/location(s) included regression (112 of 365 papers), growth curves (7 of 22), multilevel (15 of 25), decomposition (6 of 9), mediation (10 of 17), structural equation modelling (23 of 25), and other (2 of 3). Most (n = 157) approximated intersectional analyses by including interaction terms or sex-stratifying results. DISCUSSION: Few authors used the inherent strength of some study methods to examine intersecting traits. As even fewer began with an intersectionality framework their subsequent failure to deliver cannot be faulted, despite many studies including data and methodologies that would support intersectional analyses. There appeared to be a gap, not in analytic potential but rather in theorizing that differential distributions of social locations describe heterogeneity within the categories 'men' and 'women' that can underlie differential, gendered effects on older adults' health. While SEM, mediation and decomposition analyses emerged as particularly robust methods, the unexpected outcome was finding how few researchers consider intersectionality as a potential predictor of health.

Indexed as

GenderHealth status indicatorsIntersectionalitySocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID33319029
PMCPMC7726337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.