ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular detection and characterization of Coxiella burnetii in Australian native wildlife species.FEMS microbiology letters · 2025Article
- One Health approach toFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Molecular Detection and Characterisation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Common Causes for Veterinary Visits among Australian Wildlife.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Article
- A Novel Marine MammalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A review of coxiellosis (Q fever) and brucellosis in goats and humans: Implications for disease control in smallholder farming systems in Southeast Asia.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- Risk factors associated with self-reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey.Zoonoses and public health · 2023Article
- Molecular survey and phylogenetic analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Serological Evidence of Exposure to Spotted Fever Group and Typhus Group Rickettsiae in Australian Wildlife Rehabilitators.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.