ReviewInternational journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine2020
Idiopathic congenital anomalous bands: About ten cases with systematic review of the literature.
Review in International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital band as a rare cause of small bowel obstruction: a case series and review of the literature.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Review
- Duodenal obstruction due to two congenital bands: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Small bowel obstruction due to congenital band in an adult: Radio-surgical correlation.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Idiopathic anomalous congenital band causing small intestinal obstruction in a 5-month-old dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022Article
- Jejunal obstruction due to jejunocolic congenital band in a 12-year-old child: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2022Article
- Congenital ileal-mesenteric fibrous band remnant of the vitelline artery causing small bowel obstruction in an adult female: a case report.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and objectives purposeThere are various causes and associated conditions in anomalous bands. Idiopathic congenital anomalous bands are extremely rare. The use of the term "congenital bands" may, in reality, not describe the same situation. The study aims to report our series of idiopathic anomalous bands and proposes an accurate and consistent classification of anomalous bands in order to clarify the origin of each band.
methodsThis study, conducted from January 2005 to January 2018, included all patients admitted to the emergency departments with a clinical diagnosis of intestinal obstruction resulting from bands that have no identifiable embryological or acquired basis called "idiopathic". Recorded operative findings included the site of obstruction and the operative procedure to relieve it.
resultsThe sample consists of seven boys and three girls with age range from one day to 9 years with symptoms and signs indicative of intestinal obstruction. Surgical intervention was performed, and intraoperative findings revealed a thick and vascularized idiopathic band, in different locations, which was responsible for intestinal obstruction in all patients. Clinical courses were uneventful in eight cases.
conclusionIdiopathic anomalous congenital bands causing intestinal obstruction are not frequently encountered in surgical practice and these bands are often difficult to classify and define. We believe that our new classification is a practical communication tool for medical professionals to summarize and clarify the different types of anomalous bands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.