Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318888›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Does one's geographic location influence their use of sun protection? A survey of 3,185 U.S. Residents.

Nicole L Bolick, Linglin Huang, Alan C Geller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole L BolickHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Linglin HuangHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Alan C GellerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine if geographical differences exist in practice of sun protective behaviors across the United States, we performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data from the Health Information National Trends Survey 4 Cycle 3. Self-reported sun protective behaviors and demographic information were collected for individuals from nine regions across the United States in 2013. Regions followed United States census divisions, including New England, Middle Atlantic, East North Central, West North Central, South Atlantic, East South Central, West South Central, Mountain, and Pacific. Study participants included 3,185 people from nine census regions. Sun protection was uncommonly practiced in the United States. The use of sunscreen in the West North Central region was the lowest sun protective practice. Long pants were more commonly worn in the West South Central and the Pacific. Sun protective behavior rates are low for all geographic locations across the United States. Future public health campaigns should place less emphasis on geographical influences of sun protective behaviors and focus more so on comprehensive, nationwide sun prevention campaigns.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyGeographical differencesPublic healthSun protective behaviors

Identifiers

PMID33318888
PMCPMC7723814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.