Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318873›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2021

Emerging analytical tools for the detection of the third gasotransmitter H

Hany Ibrahim, Ahmed Serag, Mohamed A Farag

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Thiophene Esters Are Not Selective for HACS chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  3. CSE/HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. An Expanded Palette of Fluorescent COS/HAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hany IbrahimAnalytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Egyptian Russian University, Cairo 11829, Egypt.
Ahmed SeragPharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11751, Egypt.
Mohamed A FaragPharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EGAmerican University in Cairo · EGEgyptian Russian University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydrogen sulfide (H AIM OF REVIEW: This review stages special emphasis on the several analytical technologies used for its determination including spectroscopic, chromatographic, and electrochemical methods. Advantages and limitations with regards to the application of each technique are highlighted with special emphasis on its employment for H KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS AND IMPORTANT FINDINGS OF REVIEW: Fluorescence methods applied for H

Indexed as

Chemiluminescent probesChromatographic bioanalysisChromatographic methodsColorimetric probesElectrochemical sensorsFluorescent probesHydrogen sulfide H2Sin vivo detection

Identifiers

PMID33318873
PMCPMC7728591
OpenAlexW3028738394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.