Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318858›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Factors associated with loneliness in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Ewa Kobos, Alicja Szewczyk, Janina Kokoszka-Paszkot, Beata Dziedzic

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa KobosDepartment of Development of Nursing, Social and Medical Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-8411
Alicja SzewczykPolish Federation for Education in Diabetology Warsaw Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4167-0361
Janina Kokoszka-PaszkotSpecialistic Hospital Gorlice Poland.
Beata DziedzicDepartment of Development of Nursing, Social and Medical Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4099-6597
Medical University of Warsaw · PLChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To (a) explore the prevalence of loneliness in patients with diabetes mellitus and (b) identify loneliness-related factors in the group of hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: The study included 248 patients with diabetes mellitus who were staying in six Polish hospitals. A questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical data, and the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA), was used for research data collection. Data were collected from March 2019 to June 2019. Results: Patients with diabetes generally experience moderate loneliness, with almost one-fifth (16%) of patients experiencing intense loneliness. The patients scored a mean 9.94 out of a possible 20 in belongings and affiliation category and 20.14 out of a possible 40 in the intimate others category. Lower education, being single and the presence of chronic complications of diabetes mellitus were risk factors for increased loneliness.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusLonelinessCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPolandSurveys and Questionnairesadultsdiabetes mellituslonelinessnursing

Identifiers

PMID33318858
PMCPMC7729652
OpenAlexW3096731486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.