Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33318847›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Assessment and analysis of patient safety competency of Chinese nurses with associate degrees: A cross-sectional study.

Lupei Yan, Lili Yao, Yuerong Li, Hao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Occupational Safety and Health Training for Undergraduates Nursing Students: A Spanish Pilot.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lupei YanDepartment of Anesthesiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.ORCID 0000-0002-1648-9352
Lili YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Yuerong LiDepartment of Anesthesiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Hao ChenDepartment of Epidemiology School of Public Health and Management Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the patient safety competency (PSC) of Chinese nurses with associate degrees (ADNs) and explore factors. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A convenience sample of 451 ADNs working in 18 hospitals located in Chongqing city of China was investigated using the Patient Safety Competency Nurse Evaluation Scale (PSCNES). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Results: ADNs had a moderate level of PSC. In terms of the six dimensions of PSC, ADNs performed well in clinical practice and safety risk management, while they performed poorly in patient-centred care and patient safety culture. Statistically significant differences were reported in two items. Firstly, ADNs who have participated in patient safety training had a higher level in all dimensions of PSC than those who have not participated in related training. Secondly, ADNs without professional titles had a higher level of patient safety culture than those with professional titles.

Indexed as

NursesPatient SafetyChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSafety ManagementChinanurses with associate degreesnursing educationpatient safety competencyquality and safety

Identifiers

PMID33318847
PMCPMC7729662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.